Quantcast

Socialize

FacebookTwitter

Obama’s $600 Billion In Spending Cuts Called “Unserious” By Republicans — Who Proposed Only $300 Billion In Cuts

facebook Obamas $600 Billion In Spending Cuts Called Unserious By Republicans    Who Proposed Only $300 Billion In Cuts twitter Obamas $600 Billion In Spending Cuts Called Unserious By Republicans    Who Proposed Only $300 Billion In Cuts tumblr Obamas $600 Billion In Spending Cuts Called Unserious By Republicans    Who Proposed Only $300 Billion In Cuts

 

McConnellandObama Obamas $600 Billion In Spending Cuts Called Unserious By Republicans    Who Proposed Only $300 Billion In CutsAs the fiscal cliff approaches, Republicans and Democrats continue to debate which party is less serious about  negotiations. Seriously. In fact, actual negotiations over the fiscal cliff have pretty much come to a standstill because they are too busy calling each other unserious. You think we’re kidding? You think we’re not serious? Seriously, we’re serious. Seriousseriousserious.  Aaaaand … do we have another one for you? Yep, here it is: super serious.

But perhaps no one is more serious about having a debate over the seriousness of the budget crisis as Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH), who held a press conference to announce that President Obama’s proposal “wasn’t a serious one” because it didn’t contain enough spending cuts. In fact, Obama’s budget proposal was allegedly so unserious that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) “burst into laughter” when he first saw the measly little spending cuts Obama offered in exchange for a tax increase on the wealthiest 2% of earners.

So what did Obama’s budget contain that was so hilarious as to elicit actual LULZ from the Senate Minority Leader?  According to Bloomberg News, Obama’s budget proposal calls for roughly $600 billion in spending cuts:

It calls for $1.6 trillion in tax increases, $350 billion in cuts in health programs, $250 billion in cuts in other programs and $800 billion in assumed savings from the wind-down of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to the officials, who asked for anonymity.

Oh. That’s not really that funny. There’s not a even single Boehner joke in there, which would have been legitimately hilarious.

Okay, well maybe McConnell meant that Obama’s budget was funny in comparison to what the Republicans came up with?  What did the Republicans come up with again? You with the beard, in the back, yes you, Mr. Krugman? What say you?

In his interview with the Wall Street Journal, Mitch McConnell finally mentioned a few sort-of specifics about what spending cuts the GOP wants: raising the Medicare age, charging higher premiums to affluent Medicare recipients, and changing the price indexing of Social Security. But how much does all this amount to?

…[I]f we take all of McConnell’s ideas together, we get a bit more than $300 billion.

In other words, McConnell’s super-duper serious budget proposal calls for half the spending cuts that the Obama budget calls for.  Oh now we get it!!  Hahahahha, that’s hilarious, actually. Well played, Republicans.

*Super serious shameless plug:  Hey guys, remember that thing you’ve been meaning to buy on Amazon?  Why not be awesome and go buy it via this super helpful link we are providing right here?

/

facebook Obamas $600 Billion In Spending Cuts Called Unserious By Republicans    Who Proposed Only $300 Billion In Cuts twitter Obamas $600 Billion In Spending Cuts Called Unserious By Republicans    Who Proposed Only $300 Billion In Cuts tumblr Obamas $600 Billion In Spending Cuts Called Unserious By Republicans    Who Proposed Only $300 Billion In Cuts

@TheDailyDolt on Twitter

3 Responses to Obama’s $600 Billion In Spending Cuts Called “Unserious” By Republicans — Who Proposed Only $300 Billion In Cuts

  1. Dave

    at

    Haha…this is awesome, seriously.

    PS I love the shameless Amazon plug at the end.

    …now back to my boring desk job…

    • Linda (The Daily Dolt)

      Linda the Dolt

      at

      HGH, you know I'm shameless.

  2. Hello Web Admin, I noticed that your On-Page SEO is is missing a few factors, for one you do not use all three H tags in your post, also I notice that you are not using bold or italics properly in your SEO optimization. On-Page SEO means more now than ever since the new Google update: Panda. No longer are backlinks and simply pinging or sending out a RSS feed the key to getting Google PageRank or Alexa Rankings, You now NEED On-Page SEO. So what is good On-Page SEO?First your keyword must appear in the title.Then it must appear in the URL.You have to optimize your keyword and make sure that it has a nice keyword density of 3-5% in your article with relevant LSI (Latent Semantic Indexing). Then you should spread all H1,H2,H3 tags in your article.Your Keyword should appear in your first paragraph and in the last sentence of the page. You should have relevant usage of Bold and italics of your keyword.There should be one internal link to a page on your blog and you should have one image with an alt tag that has your keyword….wait there's even more Now what if i told you there was a simple WordPress plugin that does all the On-Page SEO, and automatically for you? That's right AUTOMATICALLY, just watch this 4minute video for more information at. Seo Plugin